The fifth , draw lessons form both the government and the popular evaluation results of the management discipline , taking the management discipline points authorized by the government as the quality indicator , taking the quantity evaluation results of the management discipline of the non - government organization as the comprehensive quantity indicator , design the total level evaluation system of the management discipline in a province and a college which mainly consists of the quantity evaluation and combine both the quality and the quantity evaluation 最后,借鑒國內(nèi)官方和民間兩類管理學(xué)科評價的成果,以官方的各級管理學(xué)科點作為定性評價指標(biāo),以民間的管理學(xué)科科研定量評價結(jié)果作為綜合性定量評價指標(biāo),設(shè)計了一個定量評價為主、定性定量評價相結(jié)合的省校級管理學(xué)科整體水平評價方案,對河北省管理學(xué)科發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行評價,并根據(jù)評價結(jié)果提出相應(yīng)的發(fā)展對策。
We can evaluate the quantity indicators by the function - effective coefficient method , at the same time we may use the blurred information comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate the quality indicators , then putting the results of this two aspects together , we can gain the total evaluation on the non - financial side 定量指標(biāo)采用功效系數(shù)法進(jìn)行評價;定性指標(biāo)采用模糊數(shù)學(xué)中的模糊信息綜合評價方法進(jìn)行評價,然后將兩類指標(biāo)的評價結(jié)果結(jié)合起來便形成了非財務(wù)層面的總體評價。
On the financial side we should supplement some new indicators , and we can still use the present evaluation method . on the non - financial side i suggest to divide the eight indicators into four parts , which are production ( service ) , customer , innovation and staff , and then classify them into fixed quantity indicators and quality indicators 財務(wù)層面指標(biāo)體系需要補(bǔ)充一些新指標(biāo),評價方法仍可沿用《規(guī)則》中的評價方法;非財務(wù)層面建議打破原來的八項評議指標(biāo),將其重新劃分為產(chǎn)品(服務(wù)) 、客戶、創(chuàng)新和人員四個方面,并把這些方面的指標(biāo)劃分為定量指標(biāo)和定性指標(biāo)兩大類。